EA’s Response to Star Wars Battlefront II Monetization Backlash Is the Most Unpopular Reddit Comment Ever


star wars battlefront 2

Star Wars Battlefront II is out in early access, and the state of its loot crate system and locked “heroes” at launch have angered a ton of players—enough to make developer/publisher EA’s response to that ire the most downvoted reddit comment in history.

A big part of the controversy in this case—though recent video game business models in general have caused a lot of similar uproar—is that several of the game’s “hero” characters (Luke Skywalker, Darth Vader, Emperor Palpatine, Leia Organa, Chewbacca, and Iden Versio) are locked at launch, requiring players to either spend hours in the game or pay real-world money to unlock them for multiplayer use. The big issue with this, as players have calculated together through a spreadsheet, is that it’s significantly faster to earn that real money, even at a job earning $7.25 per hour, than it is to earn the in-game credits to do the unlocking—over ten times faster.

Sure, playing a game for hours to earn characters is (probably, depending on what you do) more fun than going to work, but at over 170 hours to unlock all the characters by playing vs. less than a tenth of that for the necessary cash, it seems like a better use of time at this point to just pick up some extra hours of actual work. There’s also a clear advantage for players willing to pay for power-ups—at least until players attaining them the hard way can catch up—regardless of comments previously made to the contrary.

It’s great to have a no-charge way to pick up extra characters in a game that already costs $60, but when actually doing so is such a comparatively daunting task, it’s understandable that some gamers would feel like it’s little more than the appearance of offering the characters for free that EA is going for. Their response to the reddit thread “Seriously? I paid $80 to have Vader locked?” did not help matters. The EACommunityTeam account wrote:

It’s good news that they’re already planning to adjust the rates as they go, but there’s no guarantee they’ll be much more reasonable than the roughly 40 hours of play currently required to attain a single hero—all while not making any other in-game purchases to slow down the process. There’s a wide range in there between “a sense of pride and accomplishment,” a cakewalk, and the absurd amount of play currently required, especially considering that some of the current locked characters (not to mention future additions) are exactly the ones you’d buy a Star Wars game to play.

The response was fairly universally trashed, and it quickly unseated the previous record-holder for most downvotes on reddit: a user who specifically asked to be downvoted. EA’s comment now sits at -249k, to the previous record-holder’s -24k. That sends a pretty strong message, though not quite as strong as some of the death threats tossed at a developer, after what he said was a misconstrued comment on Twitter. It should go without saying that, whatever anyone thinks of video game pricing models, sending death threats is much, much worse. No one should do that, not just because it’s always the wrong thing to do, but because individual developers don’t likely have a lot of say in things so closely tied to the price of the end product.

This is all way bigger than one person who worked on a game, or even one game, and it will be interesting to see what adjustments EA makes in response—if any—as the entire industry continues to figure out the best approach to taking all of our money.

(via Eurogamer, image: EA)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

—Gears Of Biz has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—


Leave A Reply